Counselors as Companions and Ethics in Human Services Essay Example for Free

Guides as Companions and Ethics in Human Services Essay 1. Each individual we come into contact with every day can show us a bit of something about existence. You simply must be available to learning. This specific advisor who was acquainted with Steve for whatever astronomical explanation, however left the experience more learned about the human condition than when at first presented. From the start and without knowing any foundation on Steve the guide could have recently chalked Steve up as an extraordinary needs understudy who not the slightest bit would succeed being endlessly from home. The councilor anyway invested significant time and became acquainted with his understudy and discovered all the triumphs that he had been confronted with and had defeated consistently. The guide had the option to verify that this understudy was not the slightest bit going to surrender and get lost in an outright flood because of a progression of deplorable occasions. Each kid I interact with every day has their own story, a considerable lot of which are awful or terrifying, however yet many drive forward and will become gainful citizenry since somebody en route has demonstrated that they give it a second thought. 2. Steve had the option to profit the same amount of as the advisor through this communication. He had the option to endure and finish his instruction. All that Steve required was for another person to likewise observe the finish of the passage just as he saw it. Having somebody in the same spot and ready to remain with you through your objectives is useful to every one of those included not simply the single individual with the objective. I figure the greatest push anybody would ever get is having somebody who doesn't have any acquaintance with you state you cannot do that; it gives even more inspiration to refute them. As indicated by the National Organization of Human Services (NOHS), a code of morals is an express proclamation of the qualities, standards, and the principles of a calling, directing the lead of its members† (Barker, 2001, p.84) There are two proclamations found in the NOHS however that best sum up this code and make it material to the field in which I am at present encircled by. Explanation 45 Human assistance instructors exhibit full promise to their selected obligations, and are excited about and empowering of understudies learning. Proclamation 46 Human help teachers model the individual traits, qualities and abilities of the human assistance proficient, including however not constrained to, the eagerness to look for and react to input from understudies. In perusing Steve’s venture on the Hero’s Path there is a recognizable second that identifies with my present position that I have been observer to and helped with. As a direction secretary for a state funded school I have seen man kinds of understudies stroll through our entryway. Our latest understudies who have come looking for an opportunity to mix in with a customary understudy body are two understudies who wound up being closest companions notwithstanding each other’s complex issues. One is an overweight multi year old and experiences Prader-Willi Syndrome and sneaks food from our cafeteria any possibility he gets. The other a multi year old was brought into the world with mutation of the mouth and hands. Both are a piece of our specialized curriculum program. In light of their outward appearances, both are avoided by the other understudy, which has had almost no impact on them. To help them in this exertion of mixing in our Administrative Resource Teacher, who is well known and loved by the understudy body as a result of her understanding and supportive nature has basically nominated these two during our busiest lunch period. So as to keep the youngster with Prader-Willi from taking uneaten food and his companion from taking anything for him, they have their lunch and when they are done, are put on wrongdoing watch around the border of the school, with our ART. The kid with Prader-Willi gets exercise and it expels him from enticing treats abandoned by understudies, for example, milk and chips. Both likewise get the fulfillment of realizing that notwithstanding their irregularities they are normal understudies. During kick gatherings when the energized understudy body is a touch of overpowering, these understudies likewise realize that my office is a place of refuge for them. They realize that they should accomplish work ordering or sorting out yet they each have an undertaking. I’ve heard a considerable lot of our chairmen rehash this idiom time and time â€Å"you need to know our understudies, so as to instructor them†, the equivalent applies in any cooperation with them. Understudies don’t simply learn in the four dividers of a homeroom, they learn in each sort of condition. On the off chance that you make that condition one where they are agreeable understudies will return on numerous occasions to look for your direction and model properties they found and have seen illustrated. References Halstead, Richard A. (2000, January). From disaster to triumph: guide as partner on the hero’s venture. Guiding Values, 44(2), 100. http://www.nationalhumanservices.org/moral gauges for-hs-experts

Southern Voting Behavior Essays - , Term Papers

Southern Voting Behavior Southern Voting conduct since the 1960's Voters in numerous regions of the U.S. are able to cast a ballot diversely in general from political decision to political decision. The country has moreover had a diminished turnout rate for the presidential and nearby decisions. The South has regularly not followed these designs that the remainder of has appeared to be following. The Southern whites of the U.S. have normally followed and decided in favor of the more preservationist applicant and gathering. Where as the Southern blacks have commonly (when they have had the option to cast a ballot) decided in favor of the more liberal gathering or applicant. The South was one after another a Democratic fortress what's more, has in the previous 30 years become a normally preservationist casting a ballot electorate. This propensity of casting a ballot by race for the liberal or traditionalist applicant has been a proceeding with event. Southern show up for races has been fundamentally lower than the remainder of the country too over a similar timeframe. This inclination of the previous 30 years as well as voter turn out has as of late changed in the So! uth. In the start of and before the 1960's the South was a Democratic fortress and it was uncommon for there to be any rivalry from Republicans in these non serious states (Mulcahy p.56). A survey taken in the 1960's appeared that the southern states were the conspicuous fortress of Democratic distinguishing proof. The extraordinary case was Louisiana, where 66% related to the Democratic party(Black p.44). This all started to change as the Democratic party turned out to be progressively liberal in its national approach sees. The Democrats turned out to be excessively liberal in their arrangements concerning common rights for the white Southerners to keep deciding in favor of them. (Mulcahy p.40). This explanation alongside others is the thing that drove the Southern whites to change there casting a ballot propensities for the most recent 100 years. The white Southerners started to cast a ballot for leaders of the Republican party and for Independents, for example, the Dixiecrats, since they were more preservationist on a national scale. The Largest difference in the Southern voters o! ccurred in 1960 when the southern white Protestant presidential vote went Republican(Wayne p62). This would of took into consideration the democrats to lose the south if the dark electorate had not casted a ballot Democrat. The dark Southern voters at the hour of the 1960's were simply again ready to take an interest with their privileges to cast a ballot. This was on the grounds that not long after the Civil War and remaking the Southern whites diminished and in the end evacuated the fleeting dark political force. They included laws that made it obligatory to step through exams for voter qualification, also as demoralizing dark democratic by any means. This segregation enormously diminished if not totally ended dark democratic in the south until the 1950's and 1960's. It was not until 1965 that the Voting Rights Act was passed that restricted proficiency tests for government decisions did blacks get their sacred option to cast a ballot (Wayne p.70). Numerous blacks did actually bolster the Republican party for a significant long time since they were known as the gathering of reproduction what's more, liberating of the slaves. Dark democratic turned towards the Democrats in the 1930's and 40's on the guidance of One N.A.A.C.P. pioneer? Turn your photos of Lincoln to the wa! ll, the obligation is paid in full(Mulcahy p 37). This dark deciding in favor of the Democrats made an issue in of its self, that the Blacks were proceeding to decide in favor of the nearby white preservationist Democrats, that maintained the conventional Southern white perspectives. This lead to the proceeded with intensity of the harsh whites, despite the fact that the gathering stage was one of change. It was not until the mid 70's that when the Republicans won the political decision for the legislative leader of Virginia was the two party framework completely resuscitated in the south (U.S. news p. 210). This two gathering framework permitted Democrats to run on an increasingly liberal stage, which gave the blacks the portrayal that they needed. Casting a ballot in the South since the 1960's has followed the example of deciding in favor of the most ardent traditionalist, or defender of Southern whites sees. In the 1968 political race Southern whites in the Deep South decided in favor of George C. Wallace, while the remainder of the South split on Nixon and Hubert Humphrey. In the Election of 1972 This pattern appeared to proceed, in that Nixon was the more preservationist of the two Presidential Nominees and in this way he conveyed the South. In the 1976 Election it

A Historical Analysis of MA Waves

A Historical Analysis of MA Waves Business consolidations are now a part of the global business landscape. News about this conglomerate acquiring that company, or that business merging with this business are quite commonplace already. In 2015 alone, consolidations of businesses through mergers and acquisitions have surpassed the $3 trillion mark, and the year is not yet over. © Shutterstock.com | EpicStockMediaThere are three major types of business combinations: consolidation, merger, and acquisition. In a statutory consolidation, two or more companies decide to create a new company, resulting in the dissolution of the previous companies. In this article, we will focus primarily on the other two types, 1) mergers and acquisitions â€" MA, for short, as well as 2) historical MA waves.MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONSMA is the general term that is used to describe that aspect of management that deals with buying, selling and combining companies and business entities. It is mostly involved in business consolidations whereby two forms of business combinations â€" merger (M) and acquisition (A) â€" are applied.There have been many mistakes in the past where the two are used interchangeably, as if they are one and the same. They are both business amalgamation forms, yes, but they are also markedly different, although often used together in one term.MergersA merger is t he type of business combination where two companies join together to form a new company. It takes place when one company (the surviving company) takes over another company (the merged company). The purposes of a merger are any, or all, of the following: increase of overall competitive advantage, revenue growth, business growth, entry into new markets, and cost reduction.In this type of business combination, the two companies may be of differing sizes, although it could also happen that they are around the same size, hence the phrase “merger of equals”. A classic example would be the DaimlerChrysler Company, which was formed when two originally separate companies â€" Daimler-Benz and Chrysler â€" agreed to move forward as single, united company, instead of staying as separate entities both in management and operations. It is often done through purchase and surrender of stocks.AcquisitionIn an acquisition type of business combination, one company is purchased by another company. U nlike in a merger, there is no new company formed, because the purchasing company (the owner) is retained and merely absorbs the other company that it has purchased or acquired. The acquired company also retains its identity as a business entity, but it will now be under the control of the acquiring company.HISTORICAL MA WAVESMA has been around for a very long time; it is no longer a new concept that has just been introduced in the business world. It has started making its presence felt as early as the latter part of the 1800s, and the increasing competitiveness in the global business landscape was largely instrumental in its widespread application.The evolution of MA is broken down in six stages or “waves”, and we will look into those waves in the succeeding discussion.First Wave (1893-1904)The first wave of MA came to be known as the “great merger movement” in the US business scene, particularly the manufacturing sector. This wave was characterized by horizontal mergers, w here firms that operate within the same industry or field â€" often as competitors or rivals â€" combine together. This is often brought about by larger corporations that are aiming for more efficient economies of scale since the companies joining together are providing the same products or services. Thus, forming trusts became the norm. This was particularly attractive to companies that wanted to establish monopolies and market dominance, seeing as the combinations resulted to larger combined market shares.The period between 1893 and 1904, and immediately before the beginning of World War I, saw the rise of manufacturing and transportation giants in the United States, particularly in the industries of steel, oil, mining and railroads. The telephone industry also benefited from horizontal mergers.The prime examples of horizontal integration during the first wave included:Standard Oil Company of New Jersey (1899).  This American oil and gas company was founded in 1870 but officially became a trust as the “New Jersey Holding Company” in 1899.United States Steel Corporation (1901).  This steel company was founded in 1901 by merger/buyout of Carnegie Steel Company, Federal Steel Company, National Steel Company and J.P. Morgan. This made it the largest steel producer, as well as the largest corporation, in the whole world at the time.International Harvester Corporation (1902).  IHC is a prime American manufacturer of machinery and equipment for agricultural and construction purposes, and commercial and household products. It was formed with the merger by J.P. Morgan of five agricultural equipment firms, including the Deering Harvester Company and the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company.Second Wave (1919-1929)The monopolies created through horizontal integration during the First Wave resulted to the government intervening and enacting laws that ban or prohibit what they referred to as “anticompetitive behavior”. Case in point: the Standard Oil Company was r uled as an illegal monopoly by the US Supreme Court in 1911. This led to the company switching over to vertical integration, which was the identifying facet of the Second Wave of the MAVertical mergers are more efficiency-oriented; rather than increasing revenue, the goal is to reduce costs and improve a company’s overall efficiency. This type of merger involves two companies that are not competitors but collaborators, in the sense that they used to purchase from each other in the past. Thus, it is a common sight to see a bidder or buyer expanding the company’s operations towards the resources (upstream) or the end-user (downstream).An example would be a company that sells raw materials used by another company in its manufacturing processes. The cost of finding suppliers and distributors, as well as the costs involved in negotiations with third parties will be eliminated since the companies are already joined. The major benefit in this type of merger can be felt in the supply an d logistics divisions.One effect of this MA wave was oligopolies taking the place of monopolies. The companies that were not able to get a piece of the action during the First Wave were left to merge with other businesses or acquire other companies in order to remain competitive with the bigger players created during the first wave. This wave ended during the Great Depression and the crash in 1929.The major players were automobile manufacturers, with Ford and FIAT leading the pack. The oil and gas industry also adapted during the second wave, as evidenced by the Standard Oil Company moving from horizontal to vertical integration, expanding its operations to oil refining, retailing and marketing.Third Wave (1955-1970)Expansion and diversification became the main drivers of the decisions made by companies when the Third Wave rolled around. When neither horizontal nor vertical integrations provided the solutions that these large companies were looking for, they turned their attention t o conglomerate mergers and acquisitions.Conglomerate mergers and acquisitions involve companies or corporations that belong to various fields of business, often unrelated to each other. They do not have to belong to the same industry or space, and their products or services may be vastly different or have nothing to do with one another.This Wave was spurred by the desire of US corporations to enter new markets and diversify their revenue streams. Therefore, holding companies and conglomerates cropped up left and right.It did not last long, however. The crash in share prices, amplified by the oil crisis in the first part of the 1970s, resulted in the end of the Third Wave.One of the major names that resulted during the Third Wave was the General Electric Company. Originally, it rode the Second Wave when it absorbed the National Electric Lamp Association (NELA) and made it a major component of its lighting division.Fourth Wave (1974-1989)The Fourth Wave saw the arrival of corporate ra iders on the scene, and hostile takeovers and congeneric mergers became commonplace.The moniker “corporate raider” has been granted to any investor or financier who seeks to take control of a business or a company by acquiring large shareholdings or a controlling interest, often in a less than congenial manner. Hence, the term “hostile takeover”, which is a type of acquisition or merger made without the wishes or even the consent of the owners, shareholders, or management of the company being acquired. As the word “hostile” implies, this takeover is on the unfriendly side, and involves a lot of friction for everyone involved.Congeneric mergers, on the other hand, take place between two companies or businesses that belong to the same industry â€" or in different but related industries that allow them to have synergyâ€" but are not involved in making the same products or providing the same services.In both cases, the companies merged or combined are involved in business in similar or related fields but do not have the same offerings to the market.During this wave, investment banks played a more active role, willing to dole out large sums of cash in order to aid their clients â€" the corporate raiders â€" in their hostile takeover bids. It also saw the development of new markets, with the “junk” bond market being one of them. This is where bonds of companies with poor or low credit quality are being sold.The inevitable end of the fourth wave came in 1989, when the banks ended up lending too much, too often (and it did not help that the high rates of inflation also meant the borrowing costs were too high), that they were unable to sustain their capital structures. This was aggravated even more by the crash of the stock market in 1987, where many companies were forced to close their doors.Fifth Wave (1993-2000)The ‘90s welcomed the entry of the “mega deals”, where businesses had displayed greater greed for bigger economies of scale. The result was the creation of multinational companies and conglomerates which have become massive. After all, they were of the belief that the bigger they are, the more dominant they will be in the market.As such, foreign investors began entering the US market (and vice versa). The type of acquisition or merger that involves foreign investors obtaining controlling interest in the acquired or merged company became known as “cross-border mergers”. They involve two countries with the rules or laws of the Home Country (where the acquiring company is) prevailing over the acquisition and control of the acquired or merged company in the Host Country. This was seen by many businesses as the perfect opportunity to enter markets in other countries and establish dominance on an international and even global scale.If you look at the biggest MA deals in history, many of them took place during the Fifth Wave. One example of a cross-border merger is UK’s Vodafone AirTouch purchase of Germany’s tele phone and internet giant Mannesman in 1999.The gas and oil industry were also the ones that were active during this period, as seen in the merger of Exxon and Mobil, resulting in ExxonMobil, which is currently the largest oil refining company in the world. GlaxoSmithKline, on the other hand, was the result of the merger of Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham, two of the top pharmaceutical companies in Europe at the time. Their merger easily made it one of the top pharmaceutical companies in the world.But it’s not just the gas and oil industry that made a killing when the Fifth Wave rolled around. This was also when the historic merger of Daimler and Chrysler took place, as well as Ford’s acquisition of Volvo.This wave didn’t last very long, either. It came in with a huge bang, but also went out fettered with scandals that involved the filing of bankruptcy of huge names such as Worldcom and Enron. The bursting of the dot-com bubble also sealed the deal.Sixth Wave (2003-2008)G lobalization, private equity, and shareholder activism were the key features that characterize what took place during the Sixth Wave, which took place on the heels of the recovery period of the dotcom bubble.Shareholders became more involved, leading to shareholder activism, where they displayed more influence and power over the actions and behavior of a corporation by the simple exercise of their ownership rights over the management. They do not directly run the company, but they do get to have a say on how the board of directors or the management run it.Of course, this proactive stance taken by shareholders led them to take action in spreading ownership with the management and the investors of the company. This resulted to the influx of private equity.Leveraged Buy-outs (LBOs) also became prevalent. These are mergers or acquisitions where the acquiring company borrows money in order to meet the cost of acquiring its target company, allowing them to make acquisitions or mergers wit hout the need to commit a large amount of capital. This act of borrowing or obtaining loans to meet acquisition costs can be said as something that was left off from the Fourth Wave. This time around, though, interest rates are kept low, and private equity firms were more active in lightening the load.Globalization became a key point in acquisitions and mergers, and more and more companies â€" even the larger and already established corporations â€" are more intent on expanding their reach to multinational and global markets. Vestiges of the cross-border mergers trend during the Fifth Wave are still strong and visible during the Sixth Wave, but with decidedly greater benefits. Government support is more readily available, and the growth of private equity funds also helped greatly.However, in December 2007, the subprime mortgage crisis in the US, which coincided with the recession of the US economy, marked the end of the Sixth Wave.The most popular example of a merger taking place du ring the Sixth Wave was that of American Online (AOL) purchasing Time Warner for US$164 billion.Seventh Wave (2011-onwards)Things didn’t look too good for MA during the next few years immediately following the end of the Sixth Wave. It did not help any when AOL Time Warner reported an almost US$100 billion loss after just one year from the historic merger. The merger went on to become known as the “biggest mistake in corporate merger history”.The year 2004 was a particularly harsh time for MA, no thanks to the downturn that the economy took.Still, all hope is not lost, as MA activity seemed to start stirring in 2011, fanning flames of hope that the Seventh Wave is about to start. In this Wave, the BRICS are taking to the forefront of MA activity. BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, five of the emerging national economies of the world. They are either developing countries or have just become newly industrialized, and they also happen to be five of t he most populous countries. In fact, all five countries account for more than 40% if the global population as of 2015. This cooperation among these countries are putting a lot of focus on commercial and corporate activities, and it would definitely come as no surprise when MA activities in the coming years will be heavily concentrated in these countries or the continents they belong in.One thing is for sure, however: we will still see trends and patterns that originally arose during the earlier Waves. Cross-border mergers and industrial consolidations will still flourish. Hostile takeovers, leveraged buy-outs, and concentric mergers will also remain to be prevalent.